It’s sad but true: There’s no history in History

                        
122010 Historycolumn use hedshot It’s sad but true: There’s no history in History It’s true. You really can’t go back home. I visited an old friend Sunday morning and I shouldn’t have, for it was gone. It had disappeared. Vanished. It was nowhere to be found. No “Honest Abe.” No World War I. No Pearl Harbor. No documentary on Jefferson. Nothing on any U.S. President. No programming on Native American culture. No examination of any critical period in America’s past be it war, civil rights or early exploration. No history, and certainly nothing on the Great Depression, which my students are currently studying this week. There was absolutely, positively NO history. Instead, if one turned into the History.com last Sunday night, you were treated to this in prime time: From 8-9 p.m., Pawn Stars, or “how to hustle pieces of Americana;” From 9-10 p.m., Ax Men, or “how tobacco-spitting, hard-cussing, hard-working, poorly-educated timber men go about cutting down trees with modern equipment over and over and over and over and over (yawn)” and; From 10-11 p.m., Halo vs. Velociraptor, or “how loveable gear heads take modern versions of Henry Ford’s mass-produced invention and enhance them – just like your local mechanic” (OK, I’ll admit I’m just guessing after skimming a promo since I won’t waste a second learning more about it. But if my judgment is close, then maybe you and your mechanic can model your own reality show after it. Just contact Clear Picture). Wow. So the History.com executives are puzzled and don’t understand why I don’t want to spend $600 or so dollars to sign on long term with “History?” It’s pretty simple. My version of history doesn’t resemble their version of “history.” No way, nowhere close, to be exact. The fact of the matter is I don’t watch it any more. It’s clear that today’s History.com execs have no idea what history – REAL history –is, and last Sunday’s programming proved that. If one arose at 7 a.m. and wanted to watch history – ANY history – you were instead treated to an Ax Man marathon. Anyone care to join me in group-projectile vomiting? When social studies teachers and principals urge their students to watch History.com, I wonder if they have watched History.com in ages. Long-gone are the days when The History Channel was all about history – real history, the history of our forefathers, our nation and the world. That’s gone. Now it seems, History.com is gravitating to – well, I’m not sure what it views as history. Where is the “history” in Ax Men? Or the “history” in another of its prime-time favorites, Ice Road Truckers, a series featuring hard-cussing and hard-driving and definitely non-historic truck drivers? Again, principals and fellow teachers want our kids watching this? What are they expecting them to learn, other than tats are cool and cussing could be contributing to global warming? Where, oh educators, is the HISTORY? It’s obvious: History.com has abandoned its mission statement for a mish-mash of reality nonsense. There are glimmers of history when History.com diverts from its reality programming to prepare WWII in HD (which I haven’t watched, but I’m hoping from the title it does concern events from WWII), but where, I ask, is the “history” in titles like Stan Lee’s Superhumans or Swamp People (Swamp People? SWAMP PEOPLE, for God’s sake!!??). And a spinoff of Ice Road Truckers to IRT’s Deadliest Road? Please. There was once a time when The History Channel excelled at its mission. Its U.S. Presidents and Ten Days That Changed America series were but two off the top of my head that not only highlighted exceptional reporting but also were exceptionally entertaining. That, I found, was generally the case with the majority of its work. But once THC became History.com, that type of programming vanished for vacant, brain-dead pap. That was re-enforced Sunday morning and it was obvious: You can’t return home. I’ve said good-bye, History.com. I no longer know thee. What I do know is this: I’m awfully happy I saved $600 by not supporting what History.com calls “history.”


Loading next article...

End of content

No more pages to load